Founders and leaders are a little overrated. I think I've always had the impression that they must somehow be better or more valuable than the rest of their team or company. After all, if their company has a clue, and they are in charge, they must be good!
Through the past years I've acted in both capacities, and I've found that a leader doesn't need to be really good, at least at anything technical. They have two chief functions.
- Decision Arbitration
- Pick a solution from a list of proposals, or say they all suck and exactly why.
- Representation
- Represent the team, the project, the company, be a figurehead and a lightening rod. Keep your minions happy by representing them adequately.
I've found ideation and generating proposals to be much harder than picking a solution from a list, especially when I have an excellent team
[1]. Consider consumerism as a metaphor. In general, how much easier it to buy a solution for your dirty carpet than build one?
[2] That said, you do need to have good taste.
"Ultimately it comes down to taste. It comes down to trying to expose yourself to the best things that humans have done and then try to bring those things in to what you're doing. I mean Picasso had a saying he said good artists copy great artists steal. And we have always been shameless about stealing great ideas ehm and I think part of what made the Macintosh great was that the people working on it were musicians and poets and artists and zoologists and historians who also happened to be the best computer scientists in the world."
--Steve Jobs in
Triumph of the NerdsThis quote is about taste, but consider also how it
represents Apple. Steve Jobs had the "best computer scientists in the world" ! Whether or not this is the case, this statement emphasizes why he is a good leader. He loves to talk about why Apple is the dog's bollocks.
Representation in business is often called marketing, but it's the same idea for free software.
"...The Project Leader represents the Debian Project to others. This involves giving talks and presentations about Debian and attending trade shows, as well as building good relationships with other organizations and companies."
--
DPL info pageIt's a bit harder to be a lightening rod, but after a few weeks on certain FLOSS mailing lists, you will be pretty hardened to that :)
I think if more technical people knew these things about leaders, there would be a lot less people wanting to be one. There is a social/ego boost associated with being a leader, but I don't think that the work is nearly as fun. I'd rather be a sandbox-coder who can write toys and make people go "wow!"
[3] or "interesting!" than be a leader. Founders get a little bit more respect. They must have had at least one good idea :)
I'm definitely not saying it's easy to be a leader. It's a bottomless pit of hard tedious work. These people are just generally overrated. The whole of the team's ideation makes the project possible, and the leader is just another piece of this machine.
[1] This explains why it seems to be so very important to have the right people. See How to Start a Startup
[2] Consumerism creates good leaders? Nah. Consider the things people buy. :)
[3] When I was 6, I wanted to be a magician. :)